|
||||||||
|
TRUST: Walking the Talk
Written by Dianne Crampton Trust is the belief and confidence in the integrity, reliability and fairness of a person or organization. |
|||||||
|
Trust is the belief and confidence in the integrity, reliability and fairness of a person or organization. Trust is an essential human value and is the grease that keeps teams running smoothly when conflict arises. It is difficult to acquire, and if abused, harder to salvage. People become nervous and defensive with one another if any of the following occur:
People who were raised during the partial eclipse of the industrial age, the baby boomers and their parents, learned to do what they were told and to align with organizations they could trust to make payroll. They were taught to trust their leaders and if necessary lie for them. For example, the secretary learned to roll off the tongue that the boss was not in, when he was. This little “white” lie was sanctioned if not ordered from the top down. And, similar matters of integrity occur even today, when little “white” lies serve to cover up mistakes, being late for an appointment or as an explanation for why product wasn’t delivered on time. Since the rise of the information age, organizations can no longer view their employees the same way as their physical, financial and inventory assets. These assets are owned. People are not. Therefore, the organization's personnel success or failure hinges on relationship quality and longevity of the relationships it forges with employees. And, long term relationships are based on trust. Trust is so important to group relationships that people worry or become angry and discontented if trust is damaged. Or, they become numb and with the numbness come complacency and apathy. Work slows down, profits shrink, and the talented, discontented worker moves on to greener pastures. Threats of being fired no longer hold the employee in a headlock. For one reason, baby boomers are retiring leaving massive gaps in the workforce. For another, talented employees have options. Leaving an organization to find another because of irreconcilable values is the mark of a good leader - a badge of honor. In their article, The Surprising Economics of a 'People Business, consultants Felix Barber and Rainer Streck argue that in people-intensive businesses, the performance of contributing and trained employees drives the overall performance of the company. And the distinct economics of people-driven businesses call for different performance measures and management practices. These practices involve trust. According to the consultants, “In these businesses, where even the slightest changes in employee productivity have a significant impact on shareholder returns, human resource management is no longer a support function, but a core process for line managers." As such, trust in self, coworkers and leaders are essential if not mandatory for a group to excel. Trust also has a dynamic impact on group problem solving. For example, group problem solving tends to break down in low trust environments and becomes creative and productive in high trust environments. That is why it is so important for leaders to purge fear-based top down practices from the team dynamic. The rub comes in the shift between Industrial and Information era technologies. The first exposes the employee to narrowly defined tasks and expectations. There are dues to pay because tenured employees or a chain of command dynamic rules advancement and contribution. The Information age dynamic, on the other hand, embraces emotionally intelligent leadership dynamics, the ability to system think, creatively problem-solve, measure results and nurture group process. This is on the people side. On the work side, accomplishing quality work, refining processes and operating lean makes payroll. A talented new hire with a solid skill set is hard to retain if a pecking order or tenure process gets in the way of learning and contribution. The work and people balance becomes a high wire act because job satisfaction requires balance between getting good work done and the psychological satisfaction of people doing the work. In the Information age, requiring a new employee to wait his turn for advancement without providing training and a clearly defined horizontal job development path damages morale and is counter-productive. Therefore, some examples of high trust environments are:
Some examples of low trust environments are:
According to a survey released by ORC Worldwide, a New York-based provider of management research is that finding, developing and keeping talent are among the top concerns for 62% of the HR Executive survey respondents in 2007. In a nutshell, trust is very expensive if not impossible to buy in today’s workforce and very difficult to salvage if spoiled. People know trust though actions, not words. What people say must line up with what they do for trust to be recognized and “trusted”. When words fail to match actions over time, organizations loose good people or cripple morale and lose dividends. |
|
|









